"He has made everything beautiful in its time. He has also set eternity in the hearts of men;yet they cannot fathom what God has done from beginning to end."(Ecc 3:11)

Many Evolutionist will say:"I feel the organic and natural development of life makes more sense and is better supported by the data than a creator "poof"-ing everything into existence"

Better supported by the data, really? Christians believe an intelligent being (God) "poofed" the first life form into existence, then it was self-replicating.

Evolutionists also believe that the first life form was "poofed" into existence and then was self-replicating, but their "poof" happened all by itself;it was just an accident. Absolutely no intelligence at all, it just happened. Now what data supports that?

Most scientists agree no matter how simple that first life form was, it was extremely complex. So we are to believe this first "poof" accidentally, and with no intelligence, made something extremely complex?

In any other area of science, if you were to suggest that something with millions of extremely complex mechanisms simply came together all by itself to make an infinity complex self-replicating product...you would be laughed out of the room.

Most scientists will also say that it is beyond calculating the chances against that first life happening accidentally, with all the millions of complex things that would have to have all come together and work perfectly, the first time. But then those same scientists proudly proclaim:"even though the chances are INFINITELY against it, we are here, so that is proof it happened!"

I'm sure most people would agree that the chances are INFINITELY against that very first life somehow forming by itself. But let's say it did. Now what are the chances that first life would be able to eat, survive, and reproduce? And if this very first life didn't get it right THE VERY FIRST TIME, then it's over. There's NO second chance.

But some will say:"it will evolve and get it right next time"

So what are the chances of another life form accidentally forming from primordial soup...AGAIN? That would be 0%.

And even if it happened, it will be starting off from ground zero(again) with all the same problems of needing to eat, survive, and reproduce before succumbing to the extremely harsh, life-unfriendly conditions of a new world.

Even IF it survived and reproduced and had food, with no intelligence and no goal-how could it evolve? Will it accidentally evolve the right way and get better, or the wrong way and die? If it dies then we're back to square one.

The idea of a first life form accidentally forming, eating (that's no small task in a new world with nothing!), SURVIVING AND REPRODUCING, is so crazy, so over the top bizarre, it is beyond belief.

AND there is no science to back up the claim that it could happen. No scientific experiment has ever even remotely come close to reproducing life, even with mans intelligence helping it along. Let alone life forming by itself in a primordial soup made of raw chemicals. And there are just as many problems with how those raw chemicals got there!

For life to form spontaneously, it would take a series of billions of individual "miracles" to happen, each one infinitely impossible, and each of these "miracle" must occur in the correct order. Or any life that could have formed would have died.

That's not just improbable, it's impossible.